Monday through Friday, 6:00AM til 10AM Available via podcast 24 hours a day, 365 days a year
UNCLE HENRY VOICEMAIL : 251-706-2855
Email me at : unclehenry@newsradio710.com
Uncle Henry Says:
I host a news and talk radio show every weekday on Newsradio 710 WNTM. I love Jesus. I love George Bush, but not his immigration policy. I think the liberal news media is destroying our nation. I love Rush Limbaugh and his show. I think childreng should be quiet. I have no use for the new-fangled philosophies, fads, trends and technologies that infect the modern life with satanic rot. I enjoy watching Walker Texas Ranger, Mama's Family, Bonanza, Hee Haw and other such entertainment programs. Do not make noise near my house after 10PM Central time or I will call the authorities on you and you will go to jail. Do not call me on the phone after 8PM unless there is a death in my family. I like growing vegetables and fruits instead of flowers because you can't eat flowers.
To find out what is going on in Mobile, you'll need to read the Mobile Bay Times, a website from local reporting legend Chip Drago. You can visit that website by clicking Chip's head:
Here is the City of Mobile's Powerpoint Presentation on Annexation:Click Here
TROPICAL STORMS SHOULD BE RESPECTED
Monday 08-18-2008 10:55am CT
ANNEXATION EMAIL
Henry, I have been saying this for ever.... We have no voice. You should lead the charge and unite the land owners of the planning area and the proposed area to fight this thing. If they are voting into the city planning area, they will still have no voice on the planning board. That is state law. It is wrong, everyone admits it's wrong, but unless you will spend you own money, you can't fight it. If we unite, we can fight. Feel free to give the e-mail address listed below to anyone who will support this cause.
"That George W Bush's foreign policy has been a total failure is now taken for granted by so many people that one usually hears it stated as a simple truth that need not be argued at all.
It has happened before. When President Harry S Truman said in March 1952 that he would not seek re-election, most Americans could agree on one thing: that his foreign policy had been a catastrophic failure. In Korea his indecision had invited aggression, and then his incompetence had cost the lives of some 54,000 Americans and millions of Korean civilians in just two years of fighting—on both counts more than ten times the number of casualties in Iraq. Right-wingers reviled Truman for having lost China to communism and for his dismissal of the great General Douglas MacArthur, who had wanted to win it back, with nukes if necessary. Liberals despised Truman because he was the failed shopkeeper who had usurped the patrician Franklin Roosevelt's White House—liberals always were the snobs of US politics.
Abroad, Truman was widely hated too. The communist accusation that he had waged "bacteriological warfare" to kill Korean children and destroy Chinese crops was believed by many, and was fully endorsed by a 669-page report issued by a commission chaired by the eminent British biochemist Joseph Needham. Even more people believed that Truman was guilty of having started the cold war by trying to intimidate our brave Soviet ally, or at least that he and Stalin were equally to blame.
How did this same Harry Truman come to be universally viewed as a great president, especially for his foreign policy? It is all a question of time perspectives: the Korean war is half forgotten, while everyone now knows that Truman's strategy of containment was successful and finally ended with the almost peaceful disintegration of the Soviet empire.
For Bush to be recognised as a great president in the Truman mould, the Iraq war too must become half forgotten. The swift removal of the murderous Saddam Hussein was followed by years of expensive violence instead of the instant democracy that had been promised. To confuse the imam-ridden Iraqis with Danes or Norwegians under German occupation, ready to return to democracy as soon as they were liberated, was not a forgivable error: before invading a country, a US president is supposed to know if it is in the middle east or Scandinavia.
Yet the costly Iraq war must also be recognised as a sideshow in the Bush global counteroffensive against Islamist militancy, just as the far more costly Korean war was a sideshow to global cold war containment. For the Bush response to 9/11 was precisely that—a global attack against the ideology of Islamic militancy. While anti-terrorist operations have been successful here and there in a patchy way, and the fate of Afghanistan remains in doubt, the far more important ideological war has ended with a spectacular global victory for President Bush.
Of course, the analogy with Truman is far from perfect: the Soviet Union was a state, not a state of mind. But even so, once Bush's victory is recognised, the errors of Iraq will be forgiven, just as nobody now blames Truman for having sent mixed signals on whether Korea would be defended. Of course, the Bush victory has not yet been recognised, which is very odd indeed because it has all happened in full view. "
Read the whole article by clicking the Truman picture above:
Wednesday 08-13-2008 6:49am CT
USA COMMUNIST PARTY LIKES OBAMA
The Communist Party USA says it prefers Obama. He is an excerpt from one of their editorials:
" A broad multiclass, multiracial movement is converging around Obama’s “Hope, change and unity” campaign because they see in it the thrilling opportunity to end 30 years of ultra-right rule and move our nation forward with a broadly progressive agenda.
This diverse movement combines a variety of political currents and aims in a working coalition that is crucial to social progress at this point. At the core are America’s working families, of all hues and ethnicities, whose determination to move forward does not depend on, and will not be diverted by, the daily twists and turns of this watershed presidential campaign. They are taking the long view.
Notably, the labor movement has stepped up its independent mobilization for this election. It is leading an unprecedented campaign to educate and unify its ranks to elect the nation’s first African American president. Last week, AFL-CIO Secretary-Treasurer Richard Trumka told the Steelworkers convention that there is “no evil that’s inflicted more pain and more suffering than racism — and it’s something we in the labor movement have a special responsibility to challenge.”
If Obama’s candidacy represented nothing more than the spark for this profound initiative to unite the working class and defeat the pernicious influence of racism, it would be a transformative candidacy that would advance progressive politics for the long term.
The struggle to defeat the ultra-right and turn our country on a positive path will not end with Obama’s election. But that step will shift the ground for successful struggles going forward.
One thing is clear. None of the people’s struggles — from peace to universal health care to an economy that puts Main Street before Wall Street — will advance if McCain wins in November.